Guidance for Submission

All full papers or abstracts must be submitted electronically via the Electronic Submission System. If you want to revise your manuscript after submission, please log in the same account and update your file. Don't create another account to resubmit your manuscript.


You're required to use the following template to prepare your full paper or abstract. Submissions that are not formatted based on the required template might be rejected.


Full Paper Template (Word) Full Paper Template (Latex) Abstract Template

 

Submitted manuscripts should be written in English conforming to the conference template. All submitted papers will undergo a thorough review process. Authors will be invited to give an oral/poster presentation at the conference. Each paper should be with at least  8 pages, including all figures, tables, and references. Papers with over 12 pages will be charged for extra fee at 50USD per page.


To get an accepted paper published, at least one author of your paper must complete the registration and attend the conference to present the paper.

Paper Review

All submitted articles should report original, previously unpublished research results, experimental or theoretical. Articles submitted to the conference should meet these criteria and must not be under consideration for publication elsewhere. We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the most essential virtual of any academic. Hence any act of plagiarism is a totally unacceptable academic misconduct and cannot be tolerated. If an author is found to commit an act of plagiarism, the following acts of sanction will be taken:

● Reject the article submitted or delete the article from the final publications.
● Report the authors violation to his/her supervisor(s) and affiliated institution(s).
● Report the authors violation to the appropriate overseeing office of academic ethics and research funding agency.
● Reserve the right to publish the authors name(s), the title of the article, the name(s) of the affiliated institution and the details of misconduct, etc. of the plagiaris

 

 Review Process

● By submitting a paper to ICRER, the authors agree to the review process and understand that papers undergo a peer-review process. Manuscripts will be reviewed by appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Conference Committee, who will give detailed comments and  if the submission gets accepted, the authors submit a finalized version that takes into account this feedback.
● All papers are reviewed using a double-blind review process: authors'names and affiliations in the manuscript will not be seen by the reviewers, so reviewers do not know each other's identities, nor do the authors receive information about who has reviewed their manuscript.
● The Committees of ICRER invest great efforts in reviewing the papers submitted to the conference and organising the sessions to enable the participants to gain maximum benefit.

 

 Dual/Double Submissions

● By submitting a manuscript to the conference, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible papers, including journals, conferences, workshops, or other peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or workshop with publicly accessible papers during the review period. The authors also attest that they did not submit a substantially similar submission to ICRER 2025. As a rule of thumb, the ICRER submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.